Sunday, November 05, 2006

What a Dick


Don't worry, Mr. Vice-President. We're not going to give you much of a choice.

Frankly, I don't think the Dems have the balls to go after him or Bush.

But you can always hope.

From where I'm sitting and from the anger I hear these days, a nice, safe cell might be the best Dick and Dubya could hope for in the coming years......


Blogger politiques USA said...

After the blowjob on your previous post, then here comes finally the dick.

Guess what? A dick has no eyes, and a dick can easily falls into holes (slang french citation). Just like: "Whoops sorry darling, I just slipped inside of you, because I was so horny". It does not make much sense in american culture, unless american people know about Freud for example.
People bend over sometimes, other don't, but we know who the cocksuckers are:)

Sun Nov 05, 06:48:00 PM  
Blogger politiques USA said...

That said, some of your people in the US need to be hung and high. I kid you not, this is what they deserve, no more than that.

Sun Nov 05, 07:38:00 PM  
Blogger politiques USA said...

Well I am mad too.

Sun Nov 05, 08:53:00 PM  
Blogger Again said...

Frankly, I don't think the Dems have the balls to go after him or Bush

i know what you mean - it's said that addicts have to hit rock bottom to understand who they are and to accept the lies they are telling themselves - and that is the only precondition for recovering

as long as Americans believe to be the "best democracy" or even (!) to have the best judiciary on Earth, they will be addicted to the nose ring of "the best and the brightest" so easily being used by the American Aristocracy, as if they just have to control donkeys by carrots and sticks...

and when you consider the current phase of the American Aristocracy, even having reached the stage where the inbreeding hit the families so openly and so hard as seen in George W. Bush, who therefore can't be "used" as new king, but just as placeholder for Jeb - you see, that the myth of the perfect democracy works truly perfectly since decades...

for them...

because a perfect democracy is impossible - like a perfect love or a perfect human being. You have to work hard all the time without hesitation and weariness to at least approximate it - and if you stop just one moment in trying to realize it, you fail inevitably. That's why nothing kills as well as the myth of already being perfect: it stops the drive to reach it

What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? - Thomas Jefferson

Mon Nov 06, 01:36:00 AM  
Blogger Again said...

Sorry, please, OT

i need some help - stumbled across H.R. 5122 and am shocked

Sec 333 H.R. 5122 Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law

(a) Use of Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies- (1) The President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to--

`(A) restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that--

`(i) domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; and

`(ii) such violence results in a condition described in paragraph (2); or

`(B) suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such insurrection, violation, combination, or conspiracy results in a condition described in paragraph (2).

`(2) A condition described in this paragraph is a condition that--

`(A) so hinders the execution of the laws of a State or possession, as applicable, and of the United States within that State or possession, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State or possession are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

`(B) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

`(3) In any situation covered by paragraph (1)(B), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.

`(b) Notice to Congress- The President shall notify Congress of the determination to exercise the authority in subsection (a)(1)(A) as soon as practicable after the determination and every 14 days thereafter during the duration of the exercise of that authority.'.

Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007
Status: Enacted
This bill has become law.

just to be clear <cough>

it's about Fiscal Year 2007 - but i can see no restriction regarding "Use of Armed Forces"

it's about "domestic violence" - and States or possessions of the United States...

it's about "suppress" in any State [of the United States] "any insurrection"

it's about the President who just "shall notice" the Congress

but please - can anybody please explain to me the full meaning of

"In any situation covered by paragraph (1)(B), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution."


Mon Nov 06, 11:57:00 PM  
Anonymous UT said...

Citation of the day:

This is how an elder American Indian once described his internal conflicts:

"There are two dogs inside me. One of them is cruel and bad, the other is
good and kind. They are always fighting with each other."

When asked about which dog would win the fight, the wise Indian stopped,
pondered and answered:

"The one I feed."

Tue Nov 07, 09:13:00 AM  
Anonymous UT said...

What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Actually Thomas Jefferson was convinced that Americans have a duty to spread the "empire of Liberty" in the rest of the world. It is typically a republican thought, after all the war of independance since Republicans thought and still think they incarnate liberty and Democrats think they are the justice. I have nothing against these kind of thoughts, but I hate it when Republicans take their own cultural example in the name of Liberty to go kick some asses in the middle-east. What Republicans have been doing so far since the war in Iraq was to talk in the name of liberty so that they can seize economic interests in other regions. We don't need economics to achieve liberty, but they can't achieve their own liberty without economics.

If we the people are still in charge of our own country, I really hope that Democrats will stick to their own philosophy, the idea of justice, the idea of independence (energywise), and independence from the Church. These were the main ideas of this country.

Tue Nov 07, 08:10:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home